|
Hi Everybody.
I'm studying rule-based systems in
order to build my own system.
In my own system, rules are used as business constraints
on top of the databases.
I and somebody here, used to
program in C,C++, java language. So that we've found some obstacles in coding
rules with Lisp-style syntax (in RHS of rules).
Would you please tell me
know:
- Why do we use lisp-style syntax in ACTION-BODY of
rules that are currently used in JESS and CLISP ?
- What advantages can we have when we use LISP-style
?
- If we had another rule syntax that is C++,
java-style in ACTION-BODY, what disadvantages would we meet?
- Why don't we build another JESS that use rules with
java-style in ACTION-BODY ?
Thanks!
L.T.Sach.
|
- Re: JESS: Rule Syntax L� Th�nh S�ch
- Re: JESS: Rule Syntax ejfried
