Hi Everybody.
 
    I'm studying rule-based systems in order to build my own system.
In my own system, rules are used as business constraints on top of the databases.
 
    I and somebody here, used to program in C,C++, java language. So that we've found some obstacles in coding rules with Lisp-style syntax (in RHS of rules).
    Would you please tell me know:
- Why do we use lisp-style syntax in ACTION-BODY of rules that are currently used in JESS and CLISP ?
- What advantages can we have when we use LISP-style ?
- If we had another rule syntax that is C++, java-style in ACTION-BODY, what disadvantages would we meet?
- Why don't we build another JESS that use rules with java-style in ACTION-BODY ?
 
Thanks!
 
L.T.Sach.
 

Reply via email to