Bonnet Emmanuel wrote:
Hi,Is your application standalone or does it work in a network eg client/server fashion?
I am on the process of trying Jess with a Java application with its own
model.
I have a design Issue, right now I have 2 choices :
1) use the JavaBean capabilities of Jess
-> in : JavaObjects
-> middle : rule engine on Java Objects
-> out : Java Objects
2) use Jess as a "XML Service"
-> in : XML objects -> translated in facts
-> middle : rule engine on Jess Facts
-> out : facts -> translated in XML objects
The First helps to have an homegeneous application : everything is done
in Java and is consistent, but it triggers constraints.
(on my Java objects : accessors + fireproperty and on the way I write my
rules in the RuleML/Jess langage)
The 2nd one is more elegant as it helps to see the Rules Engine as a
XML service provider, it is easier to implement as no constraint will
occurs on Jess objects manipulated.
In addition, translation from XML Object to RuleML/Jess langage should
be easier.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://radio.weblogs.com/0107481/
--------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, send the words 'unsubscribe jess-users [EMAIL PROTECTED]'
in the BODY of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED], NOT to the list
(use your own address!) List problems? Notify [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------
