Follow up question: >For now, the trick is to change the rule so that either the modified >fact doesn't match anymore, or so that some -other- rule will also >match, will fire first, and thus prevent the original rule from firing >again immediately.
For me is still not clear how I could avoid the re-firing through another rule which would fire first. I tried with (declare (salience -100)) but it still does not work. So could you please provide me a simple example from your description above? This would be great. Thank you in advance Regards Mark -------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, send the words 'unsubscribe jess-users [EMAIL PROTECTED]' in the BODY of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED], NOT to the list (use your own address!) List problems? Notify [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
