Well, the thing to do ies to get an instance of both an apparently good and bad
Java string together, and compare them one character at a time, like

String good = ...
String bad = ...
for (int i=0; i<good.length(); ++i)
  if (good.charAt(i) != bad.charAt(i))
    System.out.println("DIFF: " +
        (int) good.charAt(i) + " " + (int) bad.charAt(i));

and see if you can figure out the mismatch that way.


I think Jordan Willms wrote:
> Hi there.
> 
>     I am communicating with the Jess engine using Java, and I've noticed
> some altogether strange behaviour with Fact retractions (which I have no
> doubt is my fault). I come to the mailing list as a last resort.
> 
> I am quite experienced with Jess/Java integration, which is why this problem
> 
> is very confusing to me.
> 
> Firstly, take the following retraction string, I run it in WinJess with no
> problems : 
> 
> (retract-string "
> (PropertyValue
> http://echo.iat.sfu.ca/owl/psychoacoustics.daml#hasDirectionality
> 
>  http://echo.iat.sfu.ca/owl/psychoacoustics.daml#AShok
>  http://echo.iat.sfu.ca/owl/psychoacoustics.daml#DirectionalityPointSource)
> ")
> 
> But, the same string, generated from a rdf file :
> <?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>
> <rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#";
> xmlns:daml="http://www.daml.org/2001/03/daml+oil#";
> xmlns:ns1="http://echo.iat.sfu.ca/owl/psychoacoustics.daml#";
> xmlns:rdfs="http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#";
> xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2000/10/XMLSchema#";>
>       <rdf:Description
> rdf:about="http://echo.iat.sfu.ca/owl/psychoacoustics.daml#AShok";>
>               <ns1:hasDirectionality
>       </rdf:Description>
> </rdf:RDF>
> 
> which looks exactly the same (here is my debug) window (does not work?):
> 
> [echoEdit] Retract String: (retract-string "
> (PropertyValue
> http://echo.iat.sfu.ca/owl/psychoacoustics.daml#hasDirectionality
> 
>  http://echo.iat.sfu.ca/owl/psychoacoustics.daml#AShok
>  http://echo.iat.sfu.ca/owl/psychoacoustics.daml#DirectionalityPointSource)
> ")
> 
> when I do :
> 
> Value v = rete.executeCommand(retractString);  // retractString is the above
> 
> string
> 
> System.out.println(v.toString());
> 
> prints FALSE!
> 
> PART 3 : The real wierdness :
> 
> I put together the following code:
> 
>               Rete rete = myThread.getJessEngine();
>               Value v = rete.executeCommand("(retract-string
> \"(PropertyValue
> http://echo.iat.sfu.ca/owl/psychoacoustics.daml#hasDirectionality 
> http://echo.iat.sfu.ca/owl/psychoacoustics.daml#AShok 
>       
>               System.out.println("value v : " + v.toString());
>               // Prints out TRUE!
> 
> So, obviously something is wrong with the fact string that I am trying to
> create from the RDF file. BUT -- IT'S EXACTLY THE SAME! So, why is this
> happening?
> 
> Can anyone shed any light on this problem. I feel like I'm taking crazy
> pills.
> 
> Thank you very much.
> 
> ..Jordan Willms.
> rdf:resource="http://echo.iat.sfu.ca/owl/psychoacoustics.daml#Directionality
> 
> PointSource" />
> http://echo.iat.sfu.ca/owl/psychoacoustics.daml#DirectionalityPointSource)\"
> 
> )");
> 
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, send the words 'unsubscribe jess-users [EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> in the BODY of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED], NOT to the list
> (use your own address!) List problems? Notify [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> 



---------------------------------------------------------
Ernest Friedman-Hill  
Distributed Systems Research        Phone: (925) 294-2154
Sandia National Labs                FAX:   (925) 294-2234
PO Box 969, MS 9012                 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Livermore, CA 94550         http://herzberg.ca.sandia.gov

--------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, send the words 'unsubscribe jess-users [EMAIL PROTECTED]'
in the BODY of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED], NOT to the list
(use your own address!) List problems? Notify [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to