Because this (count) is a "special form", it could only be implemented by modifying the parser -- i.e., the parser would have to expect a fact nested inside a function call here.
This is a good idea; a new interface for queries is on the list of things to do for Charlemagne. I like the way this looks. > (test(< 2 (count (statement (subject ?subject) (predicate v:feature))))) --------------------------------------------------------- Ernest Friedman-Hill Distributed Systems Research Phone: (925) 294-2154 Sandia National Labs FAX: (925) 294-2234 PO Box 969, MS 9012 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Livermore, CA 94550 http://herzberg.ca.sandia.gov -------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, send the words 'unsubscribe jess-users [EMAIL PROTECTED]' in the BODY of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED], NOT to the list (use your own address!) List problems? Notify [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
