I think Aris Katsaris wrote: > Jess reported an error in routine ValueVector.get > while executing rule LHS (Node2) > while executing rule LHS (Node2) > while executing rule LHS (Node2) > while executing rule LHS (Node2) > while executing rule LHS (TECT) > while executing (assert (MAIN::semparent ?parent $?prev ?bid $?next)) > while executing defrule MAIN::remove_separating_element_2. > Message: Bad index 0 in call to get() on this vector: > (MAIN::__not_or_test_CE). > -----
What you can get from this traceback is that there is pattern that matches semparent followed four patterns later by a "not" pattern, and the problem is in a test on that not pattern. The error message at the end of the traceback is basically saying that the test is trying to access slot data in a non-existent fact. > Anyone has any idea what is wrong? There are numerous rules > that use the "semparent" fact, so it'd be tedious work to find which > LHS of which Rule affects this... How many rules have a semparent pattern followed four patterns later by a "not"? --------------------------------------------------------- Ernest Friedman-Hill Science and Engineering PSEs Phone: (925) 294-2154 Sandia National Labs FAX: (925) 294-2234 PO Box 969, MS 9012 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Livermore, CA 94550 http://herzberg.ca.sandia.gov -------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, send the words 'unsubscribe jess-users [EMAIL PROTECTED]' in the BODY of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED], NOT to the list (use your own address!) List problems? Notify [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
