I think Mitch Christensen wrote: > Is it possible to package the Eclipse components (Views/Editors/etc.) such > that the RCP compatible ones (i.e. those that don't rely on JDT > extensions/API/etc.) are separated out from those that depend upon the JDT > (i.e. the debugger)? >
We are trying to keep the various plugins modularized, yes. > This would allow me to install things like the rule editor and rule > navigator (browser/database/cross-referencer) as plugins in my RCP > application. This would allow field modification of the rule base directly > within our application (similar to what JRules provides). > > -Mitch > > FWIW, it would be really cool if the debugger were also split such that if > the JDT is not present, you can still debug/introspect rules, facts, etc. > The debugger could conceivably 'step-over' calls out to the JVM. This definitely won't happen; the debugger is essentially a set of extensions to the JDT debugger. --------------------------------------------------------- Ernest Friedman-Hill Science and Engineering PSEs Phone: (925) 294-2154 Sandia National Labs FAX: (925) 294-2234 PO Box 969, MS 9012 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Livermore, CA 94550 http://herzberg.ca.sandia.gov -------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, send the words 'unsubscribe jess-users [EMAIL PROTECTED]' in the BODY of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED], NOT to the list (use your own address!) List problems? Notify [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
