Thanks. After I replied I realised that defining an "ad-hoc" template was
just as possible. Doh!
Thanks again,
Simon
On Tue, 18 May 2004 15:02:45 -0700 (PDT), <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I think Simon Harris wrote:
Is that for performans reasons or primarily understandability?
I'm building an app where the Java code constructs a very simple domain
model that is asserted as a set of facts. The end user is then able to
write ad-hoc rules, infering relationships that the app could never know
in advance.
Both. If you need to represent ad-hoc relationships, you could use a
template like
(deftemplate relation (slot name) (slot subject) (slot object))
or, if you must,
(deftemplate relation (slot name) (multislot objects))
---------------------------------------------------------
Ernest Friedman-Hill
Science and Engineering PSEs Phone: (925) 294-2154
Sandia National Labs FAX: (925) 294-2234
PO Box 969, MS 9012 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Livermore, CA 94550 http://herzberg.ca.sandia.gov
--------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, send the words 'unsubscribe jess-users [EMAIL PROTECTED]'
in the BODY of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED], NOT to the list
(use your own address!) List problems? Notify
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------
--
Simon Harris
RedHill Consulting, Pty. Ltd.
12/55-67 Batman Street
West Melbourne VIC 3003
+61 417 505 611
http://www.redhillconsulting.com.au
--------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, send the words 'unsubscribe jess-users [EMAIL PROTECTED]'
in the BODY of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED], NOT to the list
(use your own address!) List problems? Notify [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------
