I'm afraid that I have no idea what you're asking. Note that in Jess, identical facts are combined -- i.e., if you assert (foo) when (foo) already exists, no change is made to working memory. There are not two identical (foo) facts, only one. Perhaps this is related to your question in some way.
I think ben said salma wrote: [Charset iso-8859-1 unsupported, filtering to ASCII...] > hello, > thank you for answer, i understand the bakward chaining but i still have a > problem with firing rules: > i have 3 rules R1, R2, R3, that activate the same rule R4 > R1-> R4 > R2-> R4 > R3 -> R4 > but the rule R4 is activated only by R3 (the last one declared) even if i > assert the facts that fire R1 or R2 > how can i remedy to this? --------------------------------------------------------- Ernest Friedman-Hill Advanced Software Research Phone: (925) 294-2154 Sandia National Labs FAX: (925) 294-2234 PO Box 969, MS 9012 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Livermore, CA 94550 http://herzberg.ca.sandia.gov -------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, send the words 'unsubscribe jess-users [EMAIL PROTECTED]' in the BODY of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED], NOT to the list (use your own address!) List problems? Notify [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
