Rand,
Specificity strategy says that rule engine chooses to fire the rule with
more matching patterns. Without looking into individual slots of your
facts, Rule 1 has 5 matches (5 facts), and rule 2 has 4, so rule 1 has more
specific set or requirements and is fired before rule 2 is fired.
I hope helps.
Dusan Sormaz
At 09:15 PM 1/24/2007, you wrote:
I have two rule instances on the agenda with the following bindings (I
only include their numbers because I believe that is all that is important
- maybe that is my problem):
Rule1: f-24, f-61, f-23, f-1, f-42
Rule2: f-24, f-61, f-23, f-43
I am old OPS5 hacker and cannot for the life of me understand why the
conflict resolution strategy should choose rule 1 over rule 2. Is there
some issue of specificity? If there is, I sure don't see it.
Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Rand
--------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, send the words 'unsubscribe jess-users [EMAIL PROTECTED]'
in the BODY of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED], NOT to the list
(use your own address!) List problems? Notify [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------
*********************************************************************
* Dusan Sormaz, PhD, Associate Professor
* Ohio University
* Industrial and Manufacturing Systems Engineering Department
* 277 Stocker Center, Athens, OH 45701-2979
* phone: (740) 593-1545
* fax: (740) 593-0778
* e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* url: <http://www.ent.ohiou.edu/~sormaz>http://www.ent.ohiou.edu/~sormaz
*********************************************************************
