Hi all,
Is there any way to define logical fact dependencies outside of rules? I
have a system that recursively retrieves information from the Web and
instantiates that information as facts, and want to define logical
dependencies between the information derived from the assertion of other
information. Since the information is retrieved wholesale and the facts
are created all at once after they are retrieved, there aren't rules
that create these dependencies naturally. For example, after retrieving
information, the facts would be created thusly:
(assert (factA ... ))
(assert (factB ...))
(assert (edge (from factA) (to factB)))
and ideally we want the existence of factB predicated on the continued
existence of factA. Is this possible post-assertion, or is there a
better way of doing this?
Any tips or suggestions would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks,
- Eithon
--------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, send the words 'unsubscribe jess-users [EMAIL PROTECTED]'
in the BODY of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED], NOT to the list
(use your own address!) List problems? Notify [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------
