Hi everyone,

After using Jess in college, I'm looking at using it for some other more
serious work and realized I still had some lingering questions:

- One of the strengths of Jess is that we can just put facts in and no
algorithm is needed - rules fire and hey presto! But when multiple rules
fire (especially in the cases where there is some "overlap" in the criteria
that make various rules fire) are there good approaches to harness all these
firings and distill them back into one outcome which is all too often what's
required when combining Jess with other procedural systems?

I hope that makes sense. I can see how in some cases firing multiple rules
and having different paths is great, but in a case such as classification
(just off the top of my head) only 1 outcome is desired.

Are there particular phrases I can use when looking for literature to do
with this?


Cheers,
Matt

Reply via email to