Yeah, I knew about BeanInfo classes, but after using them for a while, I'm not 
too satisfied (usability).
 
Of course I could write some code that produce a Deftemplate, but what I'm 
interested in is a solution that include JessDE working accordingly.
 
That's why I was thinking about replacing the default Bean introspection 
mechanism, but I'm not even sure it would work for JessDE. 
Thanks again.



> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [email protected]> Subject: Re: JESS: using 
> annotations> Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2008 10:04:27 -0400> > Jess 7.1 still supports 
> JDK 1.4, so annotations aren't available. > Future Jess versions will support 
> Java 5+ .> > I like the fact that Jess supports the JavaBeans spec; it's nice 
> to be > able to refer people to that for details. It's one less "invention" > 
> that needs to be maintained by us.> > It's not true, of course, that you're 
> restricted to following naming > conventions, as JavaBeans includes the 
> BeanInfo concept for describing > variances from the conventions.> > In any 
> case, the jess.Deftemplate class has a complete public API; > you should be 
> able write a Userfunction in Java which turned classes > into Deftemplates 
> following annotations using whatever scheme you > like. If you do this, and 
> describe it in our Wiki, then other people > could use it too!> > > On Jul 
> 15, 2008, at 11:54 PM, Skeptic 2000 wrote:> > >> > Hi,> >> > Have you 
> considered using annotations instead of naming scheme to > > create 
> deftemplates associated to shadow facts ?> >> > Do you think it would be 
> difficult thing to "hack" ?> >> > Thanks.> >> >> > 
> ---------------------------------------------------------> Ernest 
> Friedman-Hill> Informatics & Decision Sciences, Sandia National Laboratories> 
> PO Box 969, MS 9012, Livermore, CA 94550> http://www.jessrules.com> > > > > > 
> > --------------------------------------------------------------------> To 
> unsubscribe, send the words 'unsubscribe jess-users [EMAIL PROTECTED]'> in 
> the BODY of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED], NOT to the list> (use your own 
> address!) List problems? Notify [EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
> --------------------------------------------------------------------> 
_________________________________________________________________

Reply via email to