Hello, I'm developing a program in jess, which use quite a lot of accesses to shadow facts, directly. I would like to know if I gain (an important amount of computation time) if i keep the results in a working memory fact. I mean, lets say i have a function in java that give me the color of a car, and i need to test several times the color of the car. From jess, should i use directly the java function (from the shadow fact) or should i use only once, saving the result in a fact, and then use the fact? Do I gain anything (in computation time)? Can you tell me how different (in terms of performance) is an access from java and from a jess fact?
Regards, Joao ---------------- unclassified email ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Disclaimer: If you are not the intended recipient of this email, please notify the sender and delete it. Any unauthorized copying, disclosure or distribution of this email or its attachment(s) is forbidden. Thales Nederland BV will not accept liability for any damage caused by this email or its attachment(s). Thales Nederland BV is seated in Hengelo and is registered at the Chamber of Commerce under number 06061578. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
begin:vcard fn;quoted-printable:Jo=C3=A3o Mour=C3=A3o n;quoted-printable;quoted-printable:Mour=C3=A3o;Jo=C3=A3o org:Thales;Above Water Systems adr:;;;Hengelo;;;Netherlands email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED] title:THALES NETHERLANDS B.V. tel;work:2640 note:-unclassified mail- version:2.1 end:vcard
