Hello,
I have a problem with the use of dependencies between different rules.
For example rule C use two facts that are given by rule A and B. In this
sense, before fire rule C, i would like to be sure, that rule A and B
were checked, because otherwise i will have erroneous conclusions. Is
there any possible way to make this?
Moreover, i think the required statement is not sufficient, because only
make visible other rules, but don't oblige the rules to be fired first.
To handle this problem i'm currently using the salience parameter, which
also is not the best way, as is easy to imagine. Do you know a way to
enforce this condition?
Regards,
Joao
----------
unclassified email
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Disclaimer:
If you are not the intended recipient of this email, please notify the sender and delete it.
Any unauthorized copying, disclosure or distribution of this email or its attachment(s) is forbidden.
Thales Nederland BV will not accept liability for any damage caused by this email or its attachment(s).
Thales Nederland BV is seated in Hengelo and is registered at the Chamber of Commerce under number 06061578.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
begin:vcard
fn;quoted-printable:Jo=C3=A3o Mour=C3=A3o
n;quoted-printable;quoted-printable:Mour=C3=A3o;Jo=C3=A3o
org:Thales;Above Water Systems
adr:;;;Hengelo;;;Netherlands
email;internet:[email protected]
title:THALES NETHERLANDS B.V.
tel;work:2640
note:-unclassified mail-
version:2.1
end:vcard
