From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 

daily devotional


Evening... 

Hebrews 9:20 Saying, This is the blood of the testament which God hath enjoined 
unto you. 


  There is a strange power about the very name of blood, and the sight of it is 
always affecting. A kind heart cannot bear to see a sparrow bleed, and unless 
familiarized by use, turns away with horror at the slaughter of a beast. As to 
the blood of men, it is a consecrated thing: it is murder to shed it in wrath, 
it is a dreadful crime to squander it in war. Is this solemnity occasioned by 
the fact that the blood is the life, and the pouring of it forth the token of 
death? We think so. When we rise to contemplate the blood of the Son of God, 
our awe is yet more increased, and we shudder as we think of the guilt of sin, 
and the terrible penalty which the Sin-bearer endured. Blood, always precious, 
is priceless when it streams from Immanuel's side. The blood of Jesus seals the 
covenant of grace, and makes it for ever sure. Covenants of old were made by 
sacrifice, and the everlasting covenant was ratified in the same manner. Oh, 
the delight of being saved upon the sure foundation of divine engagements which 
cannot be dishonoured! Salvation by the works of the law is a frail and broken 
vessel whose shipwreck is sure; but the covenant vessel fears no storms, for 
the blood ensures the whole. The blood of Jesus made His testament valid. Wills 
are of no power unless the testators die. In this light the soldier's spear is 
a blessed aid to faith, since it proved our Lord to be really dead. Doubts upon 
that matter there can be none, and we may boldly appropriate the legacies which 
He has left for His people. Happy they who see their title to heavenly 
blessings assured to them by a dying Saviour. But has this blood no voice to 
us? Does it not bid us sanctify ourselves unto Him by whom we have been 
redeemed? Does it not call us to newness of life, and incite us to entire 
consecration to the Lord? O that the power of the blood might be known, and 
felt in us this night!


Morning... 

Isaiah 49:16 Behold, I have graven thee upon the palms of my hands. 


  No doubt a part of the wonder which is concentrated in the word "Behold," is 
excited by the unbelieving lamentation of the preceding sentence. Zion said, 
"The Lord hath forsaken me, and my God hath forgotten me." How amazed the 
divine mind seems to be at this wicked unbelief! What can be more astounding 
than the unfounded doubts and fears of God's favoured people? The Lord's loving 
word of rebuke should make us blush; He cries, "How can I have forgotten thee, 
when I have graven thee upon the palms of my hands? How darest thou doubt my 
constant remembrance, when the memorial is set upon my very flesh?" O unbelief, 
how strange a marvel thou art! We know not which most to wonder at, the 
faithfulness of God or the unbelief of His people. He keeps His promise a 
thousand times, and yet the next trial makes us doubt Him. He never faileth; He 
is never a dry well; He is never as a setting sun, a passing meteor, or a 
melting vapour; and yet we are as continually vexed with anxieties, molested 
with suspicions, and distu rbed with fears, as if our God were the mirage of 
the desert. "Behold," is a word intended to excite admiration. Here, indeed, we 
have a theme for marvelling. Heaven and earth may well be astonished that 
rebels should obtain so great a nearness to the heart of infinite love as to be 
written upon the palms of His hands. "I have graven thee. "It does not say, 
"Thy name." The name is there, but that is not all: "I have graven thee." See 
the fulness of this! I have graven thy person, thine image, thy case, thy 
circumstances, thy sins, thy temptations, thy weaknesses, thy wants, thy works; 
I have graven thee, everything about thee, all that concerns thee; I have put 
thee altogether there. Wilt thou ever say again that thy God hath forsaken thee 
when He has graven thee upon His own palms? 



             Matthew 12:1-4
                 (New King James Version)  
             (1) At that time Jesus went through the grainfields on the 
Sabbath. And His disciples were hungry, and began to pluck heads of grain and 
to eat. (2) And when the Pharisees saw it, they said to Him, “Look, Your 
disciples are doing what is not lawful to do on the Sabbath!” (3) But He said 
to them, “Have you not read what David did when he was hungry, he and those who 
were with him: (4) how he entered the house of God and ate the showbread which 
was not lawful for him to eat, nor for those who were with him, but only for 
the priests? 

                Copyright © 1982 by Thomas Nelson, Inc. 
             
             According to the Pharisees, the disciples reaped a crop. They 
threshed it by rubbing the berries in their hands and breaking the hulls off. 
Then they winnowed it by blowing the hulls away. By doing so, they were guilty 
of preparing a meal. This was actually a high holy day, very likely one of the 
holy days of the Days of Unleavened Bread.

              Consider the disciples' motivation for what they did. First, they 
were hungry. Second, they were itinerate, using "shoe leather express," 
traveling with Jesus as a part of His entourage. He instructed them, giving 
them examples of His way of life, all along the way. He Himself said that He 
had no place to lay His head. They had, therefore, no place to prepare a meal. 
They did not have homes that they could readily return to. 

              These were strong, young men, probably in their twenties or early 
thirties (about the same age as Jesus), so they could have fasted without 
damage. But, because it was the Sabbath, Jesus deliberately drew attention to 
one of the Sabbath's main purposes: It is a day of mercy and not a day of 
sacrifice.

              Christ's justification comes from I Samuel 21:1-6. He reasoned 
that, if it was all right for David to allay his hunger under an unusual 
circumstance by eating bread that had been consecrated for holy use, His 
disciples could provide for their needs in this manner. (The showbread was put 
into the Tabernacle on the table, and it sat there during the entire week. 
Then, every Sabbath it was exchanged for new bread. David ate the week-old 
bread that had just been exchanged for the new.)

              So what is He saying? The Sabbath is a day of mercy. And if one 
can rightly, lawfully use "holy bread" to do something that, according to the 
letter of the law, was illegal, then it was also legitimate for the disciples 
to provide for their needs also in an usual circumstance.

              The emphasis here is on the word unusual. How frequently was 
David fleeing for his life and finding himself hungry? It did happen, at least 
this one time, but it did not happen every Sabbath. Maybe in David's lifetime 
something like this occurred a few times, but even for a man of war like David, 
it did not happen all that frequently.

              The overall lesson, however, is that it is not the intention of 
God's law to deprive anybody of good things. The intent of God's law is to 
ensure life. If the need arises, one should not feel conscience-stricken to use 
the Sabbath in a way that would not "normally" be lawful. Christ admitted that 
what David did was not "normally" lawful. Neither was what the disciples were 
doing "normally lawful," except for the extenuating circumstance.

              In this case then, they were blameless because a larger 
obligation overruled the letter of the law. The larger obligation was to be 
merciful. The letter of the law said that they could not have that bread. The 
larger obligation said that it was more important to eat than it was to fast 
(to sacrifice eating). Holy bread, or holy time (the Sabbath), can be used 
exceptionally in order to sustain life.  
             
              John W. Ritenbaugh 
              From  The Fourth Commandment (Part 3)   
             
     
.
 ======================================================
daily devotional


Evening... 

Mark 14:14 The Master saith, Where is the guestchamber, where I shall eat the 
passover with My disciples? 


  Jerusalem at the time of the passover was one great inn; each householder had 
invited his own friends, but no one had invited the Saviour, and He had no 
dwelling of His own. It was by His own supernatural power that He found Himself 
an upper room in which to keep the feast. It is so even to this day-Jesus is 
not received among the sons of men save only where by His supernatural power 
and grace He makes the heart anew. All doors are open enough to the prince of 
darkness, but Jesus must clear a way for Himself or lodge in the streets. It 
was through the mysterious power exerted by our Lord that the householder 
raised no question, but at once cheerfully and joyfully opened his 
guestchamber. Who he was, and what he was, we do not know, but he readily 
accepted the honour which the Redeemer proposed to confer upon him. In like 
manner it is still discovered who are the Lord's chosen, and who are not; for 
when the gospel comes to some, they fight against it, and will not have it, but 
where men receive it, welcoming it, this is a sure indication that there is a 
secret work going on in the soul, and that God has chosen them unto eternal 
life. Are you willing, dear reader, to receive Christ? then there is no 
difficulty in the way; Christ will be your guest; His own power is working with 
you, making you willing. What an honour to entertain the Son of God! The heaven 
of heavens cannot contain Him, and yet He condescends to find a house within 
our hearts! We are not worthy that He should come under our roof, but what an 
unutterable privilege when He condescends to enter! for then He makes a feast, 
and causes us to feast with Him upon royal dainties, we sit at a banquet where 
the viands are immortal, and give immortality to those who feed thereon. 
Blessed among the sons of Adam is he who entertains the angels' Lord.


Morning... 

Colossians 2:6 So walk ye in Him. 


  If we have received Christ Himself in our inmost hearts, our new life will 
manifest its intimate acquaintance with Him by a walk of faith in Him. Walking 
implies action. Our religion is not to be confined to our closet; we must carry 
out into practical effect that which we believe. If a man walks in Christ, then 
he so acts as Christ would act; for Christ being in him, his hope, his love, 
his joy, his life, he is the reflex of the image of Jesus; and men say of that 
man, "He is like his Master; he lives like Jesus Christ." Walking signifies 
progress. "So walk ye in Him"; proceed from grace to grace, run forward until 
you reach the uttermost degree of knowledge that a man can attain concerning 
our Beloved. Walking implies continuance. There must be a perpetual abiding in 
Christ. How many Christians think that in the morning and evening they ought to 
come into the company of Jesus, and may then give their hearts to the world all 
the day: but this is poor living; we should always be with Him, treading in His 
steps and doing His will. Walking also implies habit. When we speak of a man's 
walk and conversation, we mean his habits, the constant tenour of his life. 
Now, if we sometimes enjoy Christ, and then forget Him; sometimes call Him 
ours, and anon lose our hold, that is not a habit; we do not walk in Him. We 
must keep to Him, cling to Him, never let Him go, but live and have our being 
in Him. "As ye have received Christ Jesus the Lord, so walk ye in Him"; 
persevere in the same way in which ye have begun, and, as at the first Christ 
Jesus was the trust of your faith, the source of your life, the principle of 
your action, and the joy of your spirit, so let Him be the same till life's 
end; the same when you walk through the valley of the shadow of death, and 
enter into the joy and the rest which remain for the people of God. O Holy 
Spirit, enable us to obey this heavenly precept. 



             Deuteronomy 13:1-5
                 (New King James Version)  
             (1) “If there arises among you a prophet or a dreamer of dreams, 
and he gives you a sign or a wonder, (2) and the sign or the wonder comes to 
pass, of which he spoke to you, saying, ‘Let us go after other gods’—which you 
have not known—‘and let us serve them,’ (3) you shall not listen to the words 
of that prophet or that dreamer of dreams, for the LORD your God is testing you 
to know whether you love the LORD your God with all your heart and with all 
your soul. (4) You shall walk after the LORD your God and fear Him, and keep 
His commandments and obey His voice; you shall serve Him and hold fast to Him. 
(5) But that prophet or that dreamer of dreams shall be put to death, because 
he has spoken in order to turn you away from the LORD your God, who brought you 
out of the land of Egypt and redeemed you from the house of bondage, to entice 
you from the way in which the LORD your God commanded you to walk. So you shall 
put away the evil from your midst. 

                Copyright © 1982 by Thomas Nelson, Inc. 
             
             It is a prophetic voice that speaks for God, and His prophets will 
always have as the basis of their prophecy the commandments of God as evidence. 
The message they give (predictive or not) will always be in harmony with 
previously revealed truth, even though the prophet may be breaking new 
doctrinal ground, which happens now and then.

              We can see another difference between a prophet and a priest or 
minister. The priest or minister conserves old truth and implements new truth 
given by the prophet. Most of the time new truth will come through a prophet. 
Under the New Covenant, of course, new truth came through apostles who were 
about as close to prophets as one can get without being prophets. Paul makes 
that clear when he lists the offices in the church, listing apostles first and 
prophets second (Ephesians 4:11). Once we leave the Old Covenant for the New, 
God uses apostles to announce new truth, and the prophet is moved into a 
secondary position. However, throughout the Old Testament, new truth or new 
doctrines came through prophets.

              A minister's job is to conserve what has already been given, to 
hold fast to what was given in the past, and to recognize that new truth comes 
through an apostle. There is no apostle now, so we should not expect that there 
will be any new truth. However, if God raises up a prophet, then we also have 
to recognize that new truth can come through him. He will not break God's 
pattern. New truth will either come through an apostle or a prophet. The 
prophet breaks new ground, yet he also conserves the old.

              There is a difference between a minister and a prophet. A 
minister does not give new truth but conserves old truth. The prophet or the 
apostle will conserve the old and also proclaim the new.  
             
              John W. Ritenbaugh 
              From  Prophets and Prophecy (Part 1) 
     
. 

 

Kirim email ke