Jun
BaTien Duong wrote:
This is exciting. A technical comparision with other opensource frameworks such as Hivemind and Pico container by the author(s) of Jetspeed Cornerstone may be helpfull. Will the author(s) care to give a subjective rating on the maturity of different frameworks?
I will find some time to look at the source codes.
BaTien DBGROUPS
Jun Yang wrote:
Here are links to the Cornerstone docs. Warning: they may not be light reading material and nevertheless are food for thought.
Jetspeed Cornerstone Concepts http://www.bluesunrise.com/jetspeed-docs/cornerstone-concepts.pdf
Jetspeed Cornerstone Presentation
http://www.bluesunrise.com/jetspeed-docs/CornerstoneFramework2.pdf (PDF)
http://www.bluesunrise.com/jetspeed-docs/CornerstoneFramework2.ppt (PowerPoint)
Any comments and questions are welcome. Another document "Jetspeed Cornerstone Sample Code" will follow soon with runnable demo package.
Jun
David Sean Taylor wrote:
Im starting a little informal thread discussing Service and Component Frameworks.
Currently we are using Fulcrum in Jetspeed-2.
While I do like Fulcrum and it has been very useful for us, there are now more advanced service frameworks available.
All services in J2 are implemented as Common Portlet Services. The goal of CPS was to act as a layer so that we could more easily swap out Fulcrum in the future. I think that time has come and we need to start reviewing the other frameworks and make a decision.
The frameworks we have considering are:
1. Hivemind 2. Pico Container 3. Jetspeed Cornerstone (not to be confused with Avalon Cornerstone) 4. Avalon
I really like what I've seen in Hivemind, however the current licensing issues concern me.
I also think that Cornerstone, contributed by the Cisco team to Jetspeed, is very powerful.
Are there other service frameworks we should be considering?
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
