I am considering using Portal technology next year. As a portal newbie, I have understood that portlets are easy to develop (subclassing Portlet class and implement 3-4 methods) because of the framework provided by the portlet standard / JSR-168. Putting portlets onto a Portal should follow JSR-168 and should not be too complex.
If this means two JSR-168 conformant Portals could be easy exchanged, then I am interested in knowing the sales points of choosing Jetspeed 2. What are the main reasons why I should choose Jetspeed 2 over another Portal solution, say, Liferay (which I recently found out is a JSR-168 conformant open source portal as well) ? I am already aware of the argument that it is a Apache project, and thus of potential high quality. If this is the only argument, what constitutes this quality? Thanks, Thor Hovden --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
