Raphae"l Luta wrote:
>
> Johnny Cass wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I've been away for a while and would just like to get a quick update on
> > the status of Jetspeed.
> >
>
> Check out the latest CVS code, or if you don't have time, David's site
> (http://www.bluesunrise.com/jetspeed/)
>
> > As far as I know, the current version of Jetspeed is using Turbine 2.1
> > right? What about version 2.2 and 3.0. Will Jetspeed be able to keep up
> > and use the latest released version of Turbine? There seems to have been
> > quite a lot of changes in the Turbine CVS.
> >
>
> Yes, Jetspeed is on the 2.1 branch and don't think we should change soon :
> - 3.0 is very promising but not stable enough in terms of API for now,
> I don't want to start again chasing a moving API unless there's a *major*
> reason for that.
> - 2.2 has currently little substance and I don't see a real advantage in
> using it.
The only reason I am really even interested is Intake. It would be great
to have this functionality available in Jetspeed. My understanding is
that Intake is only now becoming usable (3.0?).
>
> However, we will follow the evolution of 2.1 when they are released.
>
> --
> Raphael Luta - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Vivendi Universal Networks - Paris
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
