> Santiago Gala wrote: > > > (...) quoting myself :( > > > > > > Random thought (take it with a cup of salt): > > > > A simple id generation algorithm: take the parent id, and > append "." + > > a max-sibling number from parent. Each portletset would > store a number > > that is the number of portlet ever contained inside (when a > portlet is > > removed, the number is *not* decremented, so it is not equal to the > > sibling count). To guarantee it, when a portletset receives > a portlet > > with null id, it will generate one using this scheme and increment > > max-siblings. When it receives a portlet with non-null id, it will > > just increment max-siblings. > > (...) > > I see David has it half way committed, so forget about it for > the moment. > > (...) > No, our emails are crossing. Please continue this conversation :) -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
- Jetspeed Proposal: iframe portlet control Glenn Golden
- Re: Jetspeed Proposal: iframe portlet control Santiago Gala
- RE: Jetspeed Proposal: iframe portlet control David Sean Taylor
- Re: Jetspeed Proposal: iframe portlet control Bill Barnhill
- Re: Jetspeed Proposal: iframe portlet control Santiago Gala
- Re: Jetspeed Proposal: iframe portlet contr... Santiago Gala
- RE: Jetspeed Proposal: iframe portlet c... David Sean Taylor
- RE: Jetspeed Proposal: iframe portlet contr... David Sean Taylor
- Re: Jetspeed Proposal: iframe portlet c... Santiago Gala
- RE: Jetspeed Proposal: iframe portlet control mmosttler
- RE: Jetspeed Proposal: iframe portlet control Glenn Golden
- Re: Jetspeed Proposal: iframe portlet control paulspencer
- RE: Jetspeed Proposal: iframe portlet control Glenn Golden
- Re: RE: Jetspeed Proposal: iframe portlet control paulspencer
- RE: Jetspeed Proposal: iframe portlet control Glenn Golden
- Re: Jetspeed Proposal: iframe portlet control Santiago Gala
- RE: Jetspeed Proposal: iframe portlet control Glenn Golden
