Chris Kimpton wrote: > Hi, > > >>>I will probably not touch the torque stuff, as I have not had >> >>time to >> >>>try the latest torque code - to see how to startup the torque >>>service... - I will just make sure the current stuff still works >> >>with >> >>>the new jar(s). >> >>if want to use the decoupled torque for jetspeed, i'll send you the >>patches to do so ... >> > > > Sounds good. > > But can I confirm my understanding of what that means... > > That means we use the "Torque" component (whatever one of those is in > turbine). It will use the torque jar for access to torque and the > generated OM files will use it too.
yes > > When I last tried this, I had to re-generate/make a few changes to > the current OM files - changing the imports. Is this the patch you > will send - or something else? you also need to setup torque in the properties file and upgrade the build process (i would propose to use the templates included in the torque.jar instead of copying them to the jetspeed repo) > > I will probably do the upgrade in 2 steps - one to the new turbine > and then to the decoupled torque.... no problem .. you should be able to use the turbine 2.2b1 jar in a few hours ;-) just send me a note if you want to switch to the decoupled jar and we can work it out together martin > > Thanks, > Chris > > ===== > http://wc2002.kimptoc.net - someone has got to win... > > __________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Yahoo! Sports - live college hoops coverage > http://sports.yahoo.com/ > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
