> How on track do you feel Jetspeed is to make "beta" by the > end of April as you originally suggested in this note? Is it close?
It will slip, it always does. Problem is that the release schedule for Jetspeed isn't anyone's main release schedule. We are working on other 'daytime' project schedules which take precedence. Im pretty much done with new features myself, but there should be another state manager proposal coming along soon. Im hoping to start fixing bugs by the end of this week, so then its just a matter of cleaning it up to the point where we can agree that the release is beta ready. > -----Original Message----- > From: Setera, Craig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 10:20 AM > To: 'Jetspeed Developers List' > Subject: RE: Jetspeed release schedule - ? > > > David, > > How on track do you feel Jetspeed is to make "beta" by the > end of April as you originally suggested in this note? Is it close? > > I've followed the large amount of changes that have gone on > since 1.3a2. We would definitely benefit from these changes. > I have a couple of portlets that I'm 99% sure will be broken > by the changes, so I'm trying to figure out when the "right" > time will be to port them over. > > When do folks on the list foresee the changes slowing down to > mostly bug fixes? > > Thanks, > Craig > > -----Original Message----- > From: David Sean Taylor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2002 10:42 AM > To: 'Jetspeed Developers List' > Subject: RE: Jetspeed release schedule - ? > > > Well I disagree. > We are in the middle of adding some much needed features such > as portlet instance ids and proper state manager. I will be > making additional features to the registry and psml over the > next week. We also have quite a few bugs in Bugzilla. All the > bugs should be fixed before the next release, esp. the > problems with the customizer and Tomcat 4.03/JDK 1.4. > > Other refactoring work over the next week: > - PortletConfig > - PersistenceManager > > Some missing features that should go in, off the top of my head: > > - full support for non-default PSML pages > - customize those pages - needs to be a list of > customizable PSML pages > - admin should be able to customize anon page > > - A Portlet StateManager based on PEIDs (there's an upcoming > proposal on > this...) > - Framework or guidelines for handling form post > parameters with portlets > > Please feel free to add to this list... > > I think we can do without a new security model for the next > release. Its just too much work and very hard to find agreement. > > IMO the next release should be beta, roughly in one month or so > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > <mailto:jetspeed-dev-> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> > For > additional commands, > e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
