Hi, --- Glenn Golden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I propose that we stop attempting to cache a Portlet. I can think > of no > reason why it would be a benefit. A Portlet cannot hold much in > the way of > instance variables, so it should not have any significant cost to > construct. >
Not sure if I understand which caching your talking about (which is why I have avoid commenting on your proposals in general - leave it to others who do know). But if you mean the actual Portlet instance, for example, like for example the VelocityPortlet, then isn't this like a Servlet and they get cached. I have used this facility - although I could have structured my code to use an independent cache, like the GlobalCache to avoid the problem. So, my vote is -1 on removing this. Chris ===== ------------------------------------------ http://www.soccer2002.org.uk - The Game is On! __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Shopping - Mother's Day is May 12th! http://shopping.yahoo.com -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
