Glenn,
I ran a little test, seems like I've got a patch, but haven't tested it
much.
Added the id from the psml-entry into the PortletConfig, and then use it
in getHandle.
Here is summary of the most important changes:
JetspeedPortletFactoryService:
public static Portlet getPortlet( String name, String id ) throws
PortletException
^
protected PortletConfig getPortletConfig( PortletEntry entry, String
id)
{
....
pc.setId(id);
return pc;
}
^
PortletConfig, BasePortletConfig, added:
public void setId(String id);
public String getId();
Here is the test portlet:
I put two of these on the same page and the portlet config returned
different ids (so did the 'portlet id')
public class BogusPortlet extends AbstractPortlet
{
public org.apache.ecs.ConcreteElement
getContent(org.apache.turbine.util.RunData data)
{
String s1 = "Config ID: " + getPortletConfig().getId();
String s2 = ", Portlet ID: " + getID();
return new org.apache.ecs.ClearElement( s1 + s2 );
}
public static Object getHandle(Object config)
{
//this implementation expects a PortletConfig object as its
// configuration
PortletConfig pc = null;
if (!(config instanceof PortletConfig))
{
return null;
}
// By default, only take into account the init parameters
pc = (PortletConfig)config;
return pc.getId();
}
If you're interestd I can send you the rest of the code (or just check
it in),
David
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
