David Sean Taylor wrote: >>Sorry to jump late on this, but I'm -1 for this as this is >>Jetspeed is already architected to be able to handle this >>(although the implementation is incomplete right now). >> > > Raphael, > > Would you consider changing your vote if Todd implements it the way you > suggested? > > David >
The -1 was really on the proposal that doesn't fit the current architecture and is not scalable enough IMO. I completely agree that it would be a very nice short term addition to Jetspeed (I may even help him implement it if time allows :) so I'm definitely +1 on the idea. -- Raphael Luta - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Professional Services Manager Vivendi Universal Networks - Paris -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
