This looks reasonable - and timely, since I've a requirement for
something along these lines. But a quick scan of the current code
doesn't turn up anything*. What's the status of this proposal? If work
is ongoing, who do I talk to about it (since it looks like I'm going to
have to do something similar anyway)?
Cheers,
jan
* Or I'm going blind and suffering from Monday-morning-itis.
PS. Quick comment:
section 3.4.1 Authentication (Required)
What does void logout() do? If it's going to live in that interface,
surely it should be
void logout(User user);
?
Section 3.4.5 Security Entity Maintenance (Optional)
There seems to be a disparity in the RoleManagement interface - should
grantRole, revokeRole both pass User objects or username Strings? If the
former, GroupManagement needs to be brought into line (or both
calls added).
Thanks in advance.
--
jan grant, ILRT, University of Bristol. http://www.ilrt.bris.ac.uk/
Tel +44(0)117 9287088 Fax +44 (0)117 9287112 RFC822 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Theory and practice _are_ the same thing. In theory.
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
