Stephaneo wrote: > I was wondering if any implementaion of the spec mentioned by Rickard > was already available (implementation of these classes: > http://wcbe2.dfw.ibm.com/wps/doc/Javadoc/WPS/index.html). It'looks like > all Turbine interfaces are not required any more, hence it should be > easier to integrate porlet handling in an existing webapp (because it > looks like there's a better separation of concerns in the API.
Yes, the implementation of those classes would help enourmously. Currently I am copying them into our codebase, which kind of sucks, and defeats the purpose of open API's. > Perhaps a > real AOP portlet engine, in conjunction with an AOP application server > such as JAC http://jac.aopsys.com would be an interesting orientation, > wouldn't it?). Hm.. I'm personally not that impressed with JAC, but maybe that's just me. But yes, writing a portlet engine using AOP is a treat, fer shure. /Rickard -- Rickard �berg [EMAIL PROTECTED] Senselogic Got blog? I do. http://dreambean.com -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
