DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG 
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13696>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND 
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13696

Cache trouble when using references to an abstract portlet in XREG





------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2002-10-16 18:56 -------
I was struggling with a similar problem. Thanks to an excellent explanation 
from David, I believe that we can solve this by extending from 
AbstractInstancePortlet rather than AbstractPortlet. 

In additiona, other stock portlets, such as JspPortlet and WebPagePortlet, 
should also extend from AbstractInstancePortlet (unless they already do so).

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Reply via email to