I'm happy to have someone else implement this idea or totally reject it for that matter, but can we please at least keep it under the same bug id and have a clearly stated reason to implement it differently than my proposal? I certainly welcome suggestions, other ideas and differences of opinions, but I was under the impression that open source was a collaborative effort. What am I missing here?


%regards -tk



At 08:13 PM 3/7/2003 +0000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17747>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17747

[ENHANCEMENT] Portlet processors

[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |[EMAIL PROTECTED]
         AssignedTo|jetspeed-                   |[EMAIL PROTECTED]
                   |[EMAIL PROTECTED]      |
   Target Milestone|1.4b2                       |1.4b4



------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2003-03-07 20:13 -------
Todd and Scott,

Good work! I'll take it for a test drive when I get a chance. I propose that we
mark one of the two bugs as duplicate and close it. The only thing that I would
ask of Todd is to include the Apache license in the sources and run them thru
our style checker before I commit it initially.


Also, it would be nice to integrate Todd's documentation into Jetspeed docs.

Finally, I'd like the other comitters to have chance to review.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Reply via email to