At 10:47 AM 4/3/2003 -0600, Mark Orciuch wrote:
> 2.  Inter-portlet communication.  This came up on user, and I
> think there needs to be a well-defined mechanism for this as
> opposed the usual kludgy, hacks we generally suggest ;).  It
> needs to be transparent and easy to use.  Todd Kuebler had some
> good suggestions, so I'd like to look deeper into that and try to
> come up with something.
>

Sounds good. As long as it's transparent and ready to go by April 14th, I'm
+1.

> 3.  Portlet/Portal event model.  This is pretty straight forward
> and might be of some help with inter-portlet communication.


I'm thinking of these two items combined right now and should have something more concrete to propose tomorrow or later today for everybody to chew on.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Reply via email to