> > I didn't think about it before but this will be an issue with Maven > > (i.e. > > updated .jar will not be accessible via Maven) :-( > > > Just keep the jar local, Maven supports keeping jars in your local repo
This won't be an issue for me but will be for an average user. Never mind for now - we just have to think about when we fully convert to Maven. > > > Also, renaming the version would be good to distinguish the original > > from > > patched. > > > What should I call it, village-1.5.4? IMO, village-1.5.3p or something like that. Best regards, Mark Orciuch - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Jakarta Jetspeed - Enterprise Portal in Java http://jakarta.apache.org/jetspeed/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
