> > To follow that up, where can the more casual contributor be of use right
> > now?

We need to put together a more up to date TODO list.  But here are so open things off 
the top of my head:

- Security
- Themes/Skins
- New aggregation engine (David Taylor is currently working on an 
  asynchronous rendering aggregator)
- Page registry (replaces psml, is not subject-specific like PSML was)
- Profiling.  David Le Strat has put together a proposal and code for this.  
  The proposal is under design-docs/proposals.
- Struts integration.
- New component framework to replace Fulcrum (and possibly CPS which is 
  currently a fa�ade over Fulcrum)
- Customization interfaces
- Admin interfaces

That is all I can think of off the top of my head.  I will try to get these updated to 
the CVS.

Regards,
*================================* 
| Scott T Weaver                 |
| <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>            | 
| Apache Jetspeed Portal Project |
| Apache Pluto Portlet Container |
*================================*

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Weaver, Scott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2003 3:31 PM
> To: 'Jetspeed Developers List'
> Subject: RE: Jetspeed2 development
> 
> What version of tomcat are you running?  The Login Portlet only works in
> 4.1.x not in 5.x.
> 
> Regards,
> *================================*
> | Scott T Weaver                 |
> | <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>            |
> | Apache Jetspeed Portal Project |
> | Apache Pluto Portlet Container |
> *================================*
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Ken Geis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2003 3:25 PM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Jetspeed2 development
> >
> > Hi.  So I found recently that the portal pam.deploy goal is working as
> > expected.  Now I'd like to know if Jetspeed2 itself is working as
> > expected.  It starts up fine, but on the first request, the
> > BasicAggregator gets an exception because it can't load the
> LoginPortlet.
> >
> > I saw someone else's post where they were getting the same error, so I
> > assume it's expected at this point.
> >
> > To follow that up, where can the more casual contributor be of use right
> > now?
> >
> >
> > Ken
> >
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to