Wow. So you are saying that if you want to do MVC style development that you _should not_ use Jetspeed 2? Ok.
-tk
At 08:43 PM 10/23/2003 -0700, David Le Strat wrote:
Todd,
What about using Struts or JSF as your Portlet MVC model? Looks like the Struts team is working with a Struts version compatible with JSR168 and the final release of JSF should be compatible as well.
Regards,
David.
--- Todd Kuebler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I continue to believe that the Portlet idea in > practice should simply > implement the controller paradigm of the MVC instead > of being some class > that needs extending by the typical web developer > just to create a html > fragment. Just like servlets are best served by > something like Struts, I > believe portlets are best served by something like > the MVCPorlet > idea. There should be a config file that ties > actions/events to views, > which the controller (portlet) uses to render it's > fragment. > > Maybe the J2 core doesn't deal with that, only > providing a container for > JSR 168, but as a portal implementation it will have > to deal with this idea > sooner or later to reach maturity imho since web > applications are almost > universally seeking the MVC paradigm going forward. > > Thoughts? > > > %regards -tk > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] >
__________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? The New Yahoo! Shopping - with improved product search http://shopping.yahoo.com
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
