Heh. Ok, looks like it's not maven.

I manually invoked the torque build.xml to generate the needed sources and jar'd those off into a safe place. Then I ran maven, without calling the torque plugin. I got a list of errors and after some fiddling sent the email below. I thought that the cause was my using maven instead of ant, as everything built when I followed the instructions to cd to build and type build war..

To be safe I did a build clean and then a build war.

This resulted in the same list of 32 errors as generated by maven.

Errors are clustered in the following files:
jakarta-jetspeed\src\java\org\apache\jetspeed\services\security\turbine\TurbineUserManagement.java
jakarta-jetspeed\src\java\org\apache\jetspeed\services\security\turbine\TurbineRoleManagement.java
jakarta-jetspeed\src\java\org\apache\jetspeed\services\security\turbine\TurbinePermissionManagement.java
jakarta-jetspeed\src\java\org\apache\jetspeed\services\security\turbine\TurbineGroupManagement.java
jakarta-jetspeed\src\java\org\apache\jetspeed\services\psmlmanager\db\DatabasePsmlManagerService.java


With 2/3 of them caused by jakarta-jetspeed\src\java\org\apache\jetspeed\services\psmlmanager\db\DatabasePsmlManagerService.java.

I did notice that the version of turbine I checked out of cvs was 2.2, and current turbine version is 2.3.

I tried the build clean build cycle after replacing 2.2 with 2.3 of turbine jar, got 100+ plus errors instead of 32, so swapped back to 2.2 turbine jar.

Anyone else having this problem?


Bill Barnhill



Barnhill William wrote:


I managed to get to the point where it tries to compile, but I can't seem to get past the torque generated classes.
I don't have time to work on it now and need to switch to using ant build currently, unless someone has it working and not committed.
Otherwise I'll switch to using ant for building right now, and continue trying to get maven plugin for torque to work when I can.


Btw, if we are going to use the [J1] /[J2] convention, should the subject start with [J1], or Re: [J1] Re: ?
I can see where Re: [J1] Re: would be nice if your client has a threaded view, but a filter rule or two would do the same thing.


Bill Barnhill




--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Reply via email to