For #5, has anyone looked into connecting the WSIF project ( http://ws.apache.org/wsif/ ) into Cornerstone as a service factory? And what does everyone think about the advisability of doing that?

Bill


David Le Strat wrote:


Scott,

I agree with you on those. A couple more features
could be:

5. The service framework provides the ability to web
service enable services.

6. The service framework provides the ability to
monitor the services performance.

I am not sure what others think but I feel that some
type of interceptor framework would be quite
important.

Regards,

David.

--- "Weaver, Scott" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:


What would be the key features that we would be
looking for?


This is me speaking, but I am sure others feel the
same:

1. Transparent JMX management of deployed modules.
2. Hot deploy and hot configuration. No more stop
container, change property(ies), restart container, wash, rinse,
repeat. Gawd, that's a HUGE PITA!
3. The use of POJOs as components would be a nice
feature but isn't really a deal breaker. 4. Self-contained deployment either via jar or some
other container/archive mechanism. Each module would have its own
config file included. No more sifting through unwieldy properties files. This also makes updating from the CVS easier you don't have to
worry about dif'ing out all the changes you made that will
more than likely conflict
with the CVS. You obviously have to perform
some dif'ing, but in smaller more manageable chunks.


Regards,
*================================* | Scott T Weaver |
| <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | | Apache Jetspeed Portal Project |
| Apache Pluto Portlet Container |
*================================*




-----Original Message-----
From: David Le Strat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, November 29, 2003 11:44 AM
To: Jetspeed Developers List
Subject: Re: Service and Component Frameworks

All,

There is a lot of good info comparing the


differences


between frameworks at:




http://wiki.apache.org/geronimo/Architecture_2fKernel


Regarding Hivemind, Howard gave a presentation a


while


back, some more info on Hivemind can be found at:



http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg08269.html


It is a neat framework and hopefully the


intellectual


property issue will be resolved soon. I


especially


like the clean interceptor model. The


substitution


model would also be quite handy to create clean
separated modules and substitute common


configuration


from a central configuration point. Finally


Hivedoc is


quite nice in providing a clear picture of the
dependencies between modules.

Another interesting approach (which is the


approach


taken by ExoPortal for instance) would be to


combine


AOP with Pico container or Avalon (Merlin seems to


be


the recommended service framework).

Lots of choices out there.

What would be the key features that we would be
looking for?

Regards,

David.

--- David Sean Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>


wrote:


Im starting a little informal thread discussing
Service and Component
Frameworks.

Currently we are using Fulcrum in Jetspeed-2.
While I do like Fulcrum and it has been very


useful


for us, there are
now more advanced service frameworks available.
All services in J2 are implemented as Common


Portlet


Services. The goal
of CPS was to act as a layer so that we could


more


easily swap out
Fulcrum in the future. I think that time has


come


and we need to start
reviewing the other frameworks and make a


decision.


The frameworks we have considering are:

1. Hivemind
2. Pico Container
3. Jetspeed Cornerstone (not to be confused with
Avalon Cornerstone)
4. Avalon

I really like what I've seen in Hivemind,


however


the current licensing
issues concern me.
I also think that Cornerstone, contributed by


the


Cisco team to
Jetspeed, is very powerful.
Are there other service frameworks we should be
considering?





---------------------------------------------------------------------


To unsubscribe, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Free Pop-Up Blocker - Get it now
http://companion.yahoo.com/




---------------------------------------------------------------------


To unsubscribe, e-mail:


[EMAIL PROTECTED]


For additional commands, e-mail:


[EMAIL PROTECTED]





__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Free Pop-Up Blocker - Get it now
http://companion.yahoo.com/

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]






---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Reply via email to