Jan, Please post you question to ONE list.
Paul Spencer
Jun Yang wrote:
Felix,
Scott already gave a good summary of how Cornerstone is used in J2. As far as how it compares with Avalon, I am not familiar with it enough to say anything interesting. What I can say is Cornerstone was is to alleviate the biggest pain we have seen in many previous projects: customization. It is very young still and we still have a lot to figure out (e.g. I need to figure out how Cornerstone can help in customizing Pico components wired using Groovy in J2).
Jun
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hi,
can anybody provide me some informations about the cornerstone-framework and his disposal in jetspeed2?
i took a short look at the cornerstone-docs in j2 cvs and it seems, that cornerstone fits nice in j2, because cornerstone will allow "mass customization" - which sounds very helpful if you develop your own portal-solutionn based upon j2 framework.
but i don�t understand the difference between avalon and cornerstone. both are component frameworks (?) and it sounds to me, that they are having the same intention (meet the requirements for framework-development, e.g.: low coupling between components, scalable architecture, customize the framework, providing some tools and utilities)?
thanks in andvance,
felix
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
