Scott,

The reason, I introduced this restriction was to be
able to tie preferences to property sets and enforce
consistency in the properties of a user profile for
instance.

I am not sure we would want to find yourself in a
situation where user A has property 1, 2, 3 on their
profile and user B property 1, 2, 6 and no consistency
in the definition of the profile properties.

Now, there are other ways to enforce that kind of
consistency that to enforce it at the prefs layer.  If
this is causing an issue, I am +1 on making changes,
as long as we keep in mind the point mentioned above.

Regards,

David.

--- Scott T Weaver
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Why do we have to PropertyManager.addPropertyKeys()
> to be able to add
> properties to a node?  I do no see anywhere in the
> java.util.Prefs docs
> where this a requirement.  Right now this has become
> a large road block
> in converting Portlet preferences to uses our Prefs
> impl.  I do not want
> to manually add allowed properties every time a new
> value is added to a
> portlet preference.
> 
> I vote +1 on removing this restriction.
> 
> Regards,
> -- 
> ******************************************
> *           Scott T. Weaver              *
> *         <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>            *
> *     <http://www.einnovation.com>       *   
> * -------------------------------------- *
> *   Apache Jetspeed Enterprise Portal    *
> *     Apache Pluto Portlet Container     *
> *                                        *
> * OpenEditPro, Website Content Mangement *
> *     <http://www.openeditpro.com>       *
> ******************************************
> 
> 
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 



        
                
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Friends.  Fun.  Try the all-new Yahoo! Messenger.
http://messenger.yahoo.com/ 

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to