[Scott Weaver wrote:] > Refactoring VFS out of J2 is probably for the better. Not because VFS > is bad (I personally think it is VERY kewl), but because we were only > using a small portion of it that was easily replicated within J2 itself.
I agree completely for the reason vfs is a sandbox component and has a much more lattitude in api changes (IMO.) As well, vfs can't have a release until it's promoted to commons proper. Very cool library though. Glad to hear factoring out the dependency wasn't too bad. > In any case, Tim, thanks for keeping an eye out on the VFS list. NP -TR --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
