+1 on using a simplified qualifier like "j2." > -----Original Message----- > From: Randy Watler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2005 6:39 PM > To: Jetspeed Developers List > Subject: Re: New development branch > > All, > > I voted +1 on this issue, but I assumed that we would not be using > totally unqualified names... that could indeed cause integration > problems. For example, I thought that soemthing like 'j2.page-manager' > seemed short AND isolated to J2. Names like > 'org.apache.jetspped.page.PageManager' are just too long. I am still +1 > provided we have a relatively unique short prefix like 'j2'. > > Randy > > David Le Strat wrote: > > >On simplified naming conventions in the Spring > >configs, I am -1 as well. I agree with Ate and Keith. > > > >--- Ate Douma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > >>Scott T Weaver wrote: > >> > >> > >>>Yup, see bullet point 5 ;) > >>> > >>> > >>I'm not sure you two are talking about the same > >>thing here... > >> > >>Is bullet point 5) about the simplified naming > >>conventions in the Spring configs? > >>Or is Raphaël talking about the refactoring of our > >>packages we discussed several weeks ago? > >> > >>For the record: I've decided I'm -1 on the > >>simplified naming conventions in the Spring configs > >>as it kills the namespace benefit which also has > >>been pointed out by Keith Garry Boyce. > >> > >>Regards, > >> > >>Ate > >> > >> > >>>-Scott > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>>>-----Original Message----- > >>>>From: Raphaël Luta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>>>Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2005 10:25 AM > >>>>To: Jetspeed Developers List > >>>>Subject: Re: New development branch > >>>> > >>>>+1. > >>>>We could also use this branch to test the > >>>> > >>>> > >>refactoring of package names you > >> > >> > >>>>proposed wome weeks ago. > >>>> > >>>>Scott T Weaver wrote: > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>>>As I was working on getting the engine unit tests > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>to work, I noticed > >> > >> > >>>>there > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>>>are still many places were we still need to > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>refactor things into Spring > >> > >> > >>>>or > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>>>make them better "citizens" so to speak. As to > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>avoid messing anyone up > >> > >> > >>>>I am > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>>>going to create a new branch to commit these > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>changes into. > >> > >> > >>>>> > >>>>>Primary goals: > >>>>> > >>>>>1. Move as much into Spring as possible. > >>>>>2. Get the Engine and PortalContext into Spring > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>(actually have this > >> > >> > >>>>>working already) > >>>>>3. Remove as many calls to the > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>org.apache.jetspeed.Jetspeed static > >> > >> > >>>>>class as possible. > >>>>>4. Refactor those services that are using > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>class.newInstance() to use > >> > >> > >>>>>dependency injection. > >>>>>5. Implement my proposed shorter bean naming > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>convention (email from > >> > >> > >>>>>last week) > >>>>>6. Reduce the number of calls to the > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>ComponentManager; again this is > >> > >> > >>>>>solved by introducing dependency injection into > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>those classes that > >> > >> > >>>>currently > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>>>do not use it. > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>>I just want to get everyone's feeling on this. > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>If everyone agrees I > >> > >> > >>>>will > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>>>log this into Jira. > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>>Thanks, > >>>>> > >>>>>-Scott > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>-- > >>>>Raphaël Luta - [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>>>Apache Portals - Enterprise Portal in Java > >>>>http://portals.apache.org/ > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>--------------------------------------------------------------------- > >>> > >>> > >>>>To unsubscribe, e-mail: > >>>> > >>>> > >>[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> > >> > >>>>For additional commands, e-mail: > >>>> > >>>> > >>[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> > >> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >--------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > >>>To unsubscribe, e-mail: > >>> > >>> > >>[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> > >> > >>>For additional commands, e-mail: > >>> > >>> > >>[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> > >> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >--------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > >>To unsubscribe, e-mail: > >>[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>For additional commands, e-mail: > >>[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> > >> > >> > >> > > > > > >________________________ > >David Le Strat > >Blogging @ http://dlsthoughts.blogspot.com > > > >__________________________________________________ > >Do You Yahoo!? > >Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around > >http://mail.yahoo.com > > > >--------------------------------------------------------------------- > >To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
