I think you mean jsr-88(deployment) rather than jsr-77 (j2ee management)
david jencks
On Oct 26, 2005, at 1:33 AM, Michael Lipp (JIRA) wrote:
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JS2-257?page=all ]
Michael Lipp updated JS2-257:
-----------------------------
Fix Version: 2.0-POST
Description:
I am trying to build an EAR that includes Jetspeed as a module (1). I
have put the "shared libraries" as (client-)libraries in the EAR and
the jetspeed.war as a web module. Looks quite promising so far. Of
course, deployment of portlets doesn't work. As far as I have
understood the architecture, the next step would be write a
DeploymentManager that uses JSR77 to deploy the portlet modules in the
application server. This should then be a "general" solution for any
JSR77 compliant application server.
Being new to Jetspeed, I' appreciate if someone could confirm that
this is the way to go or tell me if this approach is wrong before I
continue the effort.
Thanks
Michael
(1) I often get the impression that the J2EE ecosystem suffers from
mixing up components and containers. The installation instructions
give me the impression that -- although Jetspeed is a web component --
is has partially be conceived as an extension of the application
server. In order to really call it "J2EE compliant", I feel it must be
possible to bundle Jetspeed into an EAR in order to be able to deliver
a complete (enterprise) application to the customer in that format.
was:
I am trying to build an EAR that includes Jetspeed as a module (1). I
have put the "shared libraries" as (client-)libraries in the EAR and
the jetspeed.war as a web module. Looks quite promising so far. Of
course, deployment of portlets doesn't work. As far as I have
understood the architecture, the next step would be write a
DeploymentManager that uses JSR77 to deploy the portlet modules in the
application server. This should then be a "general" solution for any
JSR77 compliant application server.
Being new to Jetspeed, I' appreciate if someone could confirm that
this is the way to go or tell me if this approach is wrong before I
continue the effort.
Thanks
Michael
(1) I often get the impression that the J2EE ecosystem suffers from
mixing up components and containers. The installation instructions
give me the impression that -- although Jetspeed is a web component --
is has partially be conceived as an extension of the application
server. In order to really call it "J2EE compliant", I feel it must be
possible to bundle Jetspeed into an EAR in order to be able to deliver
a complete (enterprise) application to the customer in that format.
Version: 2.0-POST
Deployment using JSR77
----------------------
Key: JS2-257
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JS2-257
Project: Jetspeed 2
Type: New Feature
Components: Deployment
Versions: 2.0-POST
Environment: Any
Reporter: Michael Lipp
Fix For: 2.0-POST
I am trying to build an EAR that includes Jetspeed as a module (1). I
have put the "shared libraries" as (client-)libraries in the EAR and
the jetspeed.war as a web module. Looks quite promising so far. Of
course, deployment of portlets doesn't work. As far as I have
understood the architecture, the next step would be write a
DeploymentManager that uses JSR77 to deploy the portlet modules in
the application server. This should then be a "general" solution for
any JSR77 compliant application server.
Being new to Jetspeed, I' appreciate if someone could confirm that
this is the way to go or tell me if this approach is wrong before I
continue the effort.
Thanks
Michael
(1) I often get the impression that the J2EE ecosystem suffers from
mixing up components and containers. The installation instructions
give me the impression that -- although Jetspeed is a web component
-- is has partially be conceived as an extension of the application
server. In order to really call it "J2EE compliant", I feel it must
be possible to bundle Jetspeed into an EAR in order to be able to
deliver a complete (enterprise) application to the customer in that
format.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see:
http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]