Hi Woonsan,

+1

But be aware that because of the XSD validation currently applied the Pluto based loading of the portlet.xml might assume certain structures to be already ensured, e.g. required elements to be available. As result the internal "error" handling might not be as good as expected when a non-validated invalid descriptor is loaded and could for instance lead to uncatched NPEs.

Regards,

Ate

Woonsan Ko wrote:
Hi there,

During testing RPAD with some useful PAs from jp.sf.pal repository, I found 
that the current deployment component failed to deploy a PA because the 
descriptor of the PA does not have any namespace uri definition with the 
following exceptions:

java.io.IOException: unexpected element (uri:"", local:"portlet-app"). Expected elements 
are 
<{http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/portlet/portlet-app_1_0.xsd}portlet-app>,<{http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/portlet/portlet-app_2_0.xsd}portlet-app>

The portlet.xml is like the following:

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<portlet-app id="charttest" version="1.0">
<snip/>
</portlet-app>

It's because PortletAppDescriptorServiceImpl of pluto-2.0 used by Jetspeed-2.2 
is using strong validation with JAXB. I think that's fair for pluto-2.0.
However, how about having another option to ignore this kind of validation 
errors in Jetspeed-2.2? (Also, I think this option should be the default.) It 
will help using the existing Portlet 1.0 based PAs.

To do this, with the new (default) option, I think we need to override the 
PortletAppDescriptorService for JetspeedDescriptorService without throwing 
exception instantly on validation error, while leaving the validation warnings 
in log files. (See javadoc of javax.xml.bind.Unmarshaller for detail examples.)

What do you think?

Regards,

Woonsan


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]




---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to