On 03/09/2010 02:45 PM, Gonzalo Aguilar Delgado wrote:
Hi Ate,

I'm becoming again against this issue.

I'm rebuilding the BIRT interface to be able take advantage of the new
UI. I'm also rewriting everything to use wicket as the rest of my
portlets.

Hi Gonzalo,

Thanks for the update!


I don't know if you have news about your report project.
That project got stalled actually which is why you haven't seen any activity 
from my side yet.
However, the project hasn't been canceled, it just is put on the back burner 
temporarily.


I will propose this new portlet as extra portlet for jetspeed when it's
finished.
Cool, looking forward to it.
Definitely looks to be very beneficial for the community as a whole and might 
be useful for my project too.

Thanks,

Ate



Best regards.













El vie, 27-11-2009 a las 14:38 +0100, Ate Douma escribió:
Gonzalo Aguilar Delgado wrote:
Hi Ate,

I'm sorry for my late answer but I was really busy this week...
So was I, hence this delayed response :)


I think you should look for a BI environment...

Maybe you will want to take a look to pentaho (http://www.pentaho.com/)
Yes, I'm aware of the pentaho project.
For our purposes however, and the desire to deliver a *generic* reporting 
service manageable and usable from within the portal itself to be
   provided through either the Apache Jetspeed Portal project itself or, 
preferably, the Apache Portals Applications project, it really isn't
an option.
The Pentaho community edition uses a mixture of licenses (very confusing), most 
of which are incompatible with the ASF license nor endorsed
as such, e.g. GPL and LGPL are not allowed by the ASF.
Furthermore, the Pentaho BI suite is imo too "overweight" for our purposes, 
although certainly valuable if you need full blown BI support.
Besides the license problems, making use of Pentaho probably would end up as a separate 
solution with some "integration" bridging to make it
accessible and usable from within the portal, but unlikely to provide the 
"integrated" management we're looking for.
However, I'm not a real Pentaho expert so I might be mistaken in this regard.
But anyway, the license issue really is such a blocker that there is no use for 
me to spend more time to investigate it (now).


I brought some books (I'm waiting for them) about implementation because
this makes more sense for my
objectives. And maybe yours...

With pentaho you can build the BI environment in the back and server
reports with
jetspeed as needed.

I'm looking for this solution to see if Jetspeed connections make sense.

I'm not sure about the right way to go right now but your project looks
big enough
to take a look around before choosing way...
Sure, I agree on that, but AFAIK the BIRT engine itself already should be 
embeddable (with some effort) and as such, I'm expecting the
integration efforts to do so probably wouldn't amount to more (probably even 
less) than trying to integrate a BI solution like Pentaho.
And, as the BIRT license *is* acceptable for the ASF (as binary distribution, 
not for customizations), my plan is to continue with that
route, unless someone comes up with a better idea or has something already 
available to contribute :)

Besides the reporting engine itself though, we'll also need some base Reporting 
Portlets, providing access to and capable of rendering BIRT
based reports... As AFAIK Pentaho also (just) uses BIRT for that, and you 
already have some experience by leveraging this from within
portlets, your knowledge and experience in this will be very valuable!
So if you want to help in this area, we would very much appreciate that.

Regards,

Ate






Well, sure :)

As I mentioned before, we have a request to provide a BIRT reporting *service* 
with Jetspeed so to bring standard reporting capabilities
accessible from portlets.
Our goal is to provide both report definition and maintenance features, e.g. 
through dedicated admin portlets and a report (configuration)
repository, as well as allowing portlets to "serve" such reports.
Primary (first) target for such reports would be the Jetspeed own 
configuration, e.g. like the security data, but as a generic BIRT
reporting service and configuration repository it should be extendable and 
usable for any (business) application reporting integration.
Our preference would be to provide this as a "standard" portal and portlets 
solution, e.g. even usable for other portals, by hosting this as
a "standards" compliant solution at Apache Portals Application, 
http://portals.apache.org/applications/, but of course it should work in
Jetspeed-2 first and foremost, so this is not yet a strict requirement.

If you want to help out and collaborate on this or even just provide some 
valuable input, that would be much appreciated.
You can also contact me directly if you'd prefer to discuss this offline first.
Thank you.



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]




---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]




---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to