> Very good explanation ! Do you think you code write this in xdocs ?
Sure!!
But i dont have commit access. May be someone with access can do it?
> BTW, I'm currently working on integrating Roberto Carrasco velocity work into
> Jetspeed and considering to remove the Cacheable interface from the base
> Portlet interface.
>
> This way only those portlet implementations that want to be Cacheable need to
> implement this feature.
>
> To keep backward compatibility, we could have an AbstractPortlet implementing
> Cacheable and a DynamicAbstractPortlet that would not implement it (I would
> prefer AbstractPortlet and CacheableAbstractPortlet but this may break portlets
> extending AbstractPortlet and relying on the caheable interface methods...)
>
> Would that suit you ?
Yes, I think it is a good idea.
Carlos.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
