Christopher,
I have created an abstract portlet, actually I copied the WebPagePortlet
definition and renamed it, in local-portlets.xreg. It works.
I suspect their are clues in Jetspeed.log.
Paul Spencer
Christopher Abraham wrote:
>
> I'm not moving an entry from portlets.xreg to local-portlets.xreg.
> I'm adding a new abstract portlet that looks something like this:
>
> <portlet-entry name="JSPnav" hidden="false" type="abstract"
> application="false">
>
> <classname>com.MyCompaniesPackage.jetspeed.portal.portlets.JspPortletNav</cl
> assname>
> </portlet-entry>
>
> If I add this to Portlets.xreg, bounce tomcat, and then add the following to
> local-portlets, everything works beautifully:
>
> <portlet-entry name="New Portal User" hidden="false" type="ref"
> parent="JSPnav" application="false">
> <meta-info>
> <title>New Portal User</title>
> <description>Portal User Manager</description>
> </meta-info>
> <parameter name="templateNav" value="New Portal User"
> hidden="false"/>
> <parameter name="template"
> value="/jsp/modules/admin/UserPortalAdmin/user_portal_setup.jsp"
> hidden="false"/>
> <media-type ref="html"/>
> </portlet-entry>
>
> ...But if I try to put the abstract portlet entry into local-portlets, even
> if I bounce, Jetspeed doesn't seem to see it at all.
>
> Anyone have some more insight on how this works???
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
