In fact, I'm not writing any "serious" document. I'm just having a look of
what are portlets and what kind of things can be done with them. It can give
my company some ideas about newer products and screen organisations.
So sorry, I won't have anything to give you.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Frans Thamura" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Jetspeed Users List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 11:00 AM
Subject: Re: Get Maximised state


> Me too..
>
> i think it is great to share that..if you wish..of course
>
>
> :P
>
> At 11:09 AM 5/16/2002 +0200, you wrote:
> >hy
> >
> >if you finish your study your welcome to send me a copy of itt becouse
I'm
> >interested too in those posibilities offerred by Jetspeed comparative
with
> >bea and webspire
> >
> >thanks
> >
> >
> >----- Original Message -----
> >From: "Alexis Huet" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 11:08 AM
> >Subject: Get Maximised state
> >
> >
> > > I'm studying the possibilities that portlet offers using Jetspeed
portal.
> > > And I have 2 questions:
> > >
> > > 1)I'd like to know if there is a way to know if a portlet is maximised
or
> > > not, to display a different content. It seems to be easy in the IBM
> >portal,
> > > but not in jetspeed 1.3a3.
> > >
> > > 2)The IBM api looks to be very different as there are doView, doEdit,
> >etc..
> > > methods instead of getContent. But the packages comes from apache
> >jetspeed.
> > > Can someone explain this ?
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> ><mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > For additional commands, e-mail:
> ><mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >--
> >To unsubscribe,
> >e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >For additional commands, e-mail:
> ><mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> For additional commands, e-mail:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Reply via email to