I got them to work with GET, but it only works with Internet Explorer, It
doesn't work with Mozilla, the buildNormalContext action is called, not the
actions... (I tried MSIE 5 and 6 and Mozilla 1.2)

Pierre

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Michael Rothrock [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: lundi, 27. janvier 2003 19:21
> To: Jetspeed Users List; Pierre Henry
> Subject: Re: portlet object in doUpdate()
> 
> 
> Since I'm about to be working on this, let me ask a related 
> question: has
> anyone gotten JSP actions to work with GET?
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> -- Michael
> 
> On 1/27/03 1:09 AM, "Pierre Henry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> > Hi Wei,
> > 
> > I had the same problem last week (see my mail with title  
> "Tricky behavior
> > with JSP portlet and forms").
> > 
> > what I found out :
> > 
> >> - the form in the JSP doesn't need any action attribute
> >> 
> >> - the ony needed hidden field is js_peid which contains the
> >> portlet's ID.
> >> 
> >> 
> >> When I put a hidden field for the action :
> >> <INPUT TYPE="hidden" name="action"
> >> value="CustomizableXsqlPortlet1Action">
> >> the right method was called  but the portlet argument of the
> >> doUpdatefilter
> >> method was null, so the action class couldn't do much.
> > 
> > So try to remove the action field...
> > 
> > I hope it helps !
> > 
> > Pierre
> > 
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Wei Guan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> >> Sent: lundi, 27. janvier 2003 07:49
> >> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> Subject: portlet object in doUpdate()
> >> 
> >> 
> >> I have a doUpdate in an VelocityAction class:
> >> 
> >> VelocityPortlet portlet = (VelocityPortlet) context.get("portlet");
> >> 
> >> the portlet is null.
> >> 
> >> Is this a bug?
> >> 
> >> Wei
> >> 
> > 
> 

Reply via email to