Lucky guy! Write a book about it and share your knowledge - struts books
we have enough!
BTW, since your mail ends with apache.org - how much and how long are you
involved in
jetspeed / turbine? I am since 4 days and don` t think jetspeed is one of
the
"vanilla" frameworks to understand in a few days.
"Andrew C. Oliver" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
29.01.2003 14:33
Please respond to "Jetspeed Users List"
To: Jetspeed Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc:
Subject: Re: JSP vs Velocity
I found turbine pretty easy to deal with myself.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I think the popularity could be much better if the underlying turbine
would
> not be such a high learning curve. With turbine 3 it may be much better,
> since then people can bet on horses, which they already know (especially
> EJB). IMHO, What also could give jetspeed a real boost is if it would
rely
> on struts(*) - but I guess that is impossible, since turbine has its own
> mcv-model ...
>
> (*) maybe struts does not have such a sophisticated mvc model as
turbine,
> but it definitively has much more familiarity and pervasion (just look
at
> all these struts books and articles). for me it is a quasi-standard for
> web-based mvc.
>
> Kris
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
