Kevin, See Internationalization section of http://jakarta.apache.org/jetspeed/site/code-standards.html.
Best regards, Mark Orciuch - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Jakarta Jetspeed - Enterprise Portal in Java http://jakarta.apache.org/jetspeed/ > -----Original Message----- > From: Kevin McIntyre [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Sunday, March 09, 2003 1:30 PM > To: Jetspeed Users List > Subject: Re: NNTP Porlet > > > Santiago - > > The NNTP Portlet can make use of and James to moderate discussion or > simple use another NNTP resource, without that feature. > > My question is how do I Internationalize a portlet? Making entries in > each language file? > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Santiago Gala" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Jetspeed Users List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Jetspeed > Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Sunday, March 09, 2003 6:33 AM > Subject: Re: NNTP Porlet > > > > Kevin McIntyre wrote: > > > Using NNTP I've created a "Threaded Discussion" Portlet. I would like > to > > > contribute. It works with James, extending NNTPRepositoryImpl > > > to remove threads for moderated discussion. > > > > > > Is it necessary to Internationalize before contributing? > > > > > > > I would be nice :-) > > > > But I don't think a portlet which brings a James dependency should be > > inside jetspeed. (Maybe I understood it wrong). > > > > As a matter of fact, we are in the process of stabilizing Jetspeed 1 and > > planning a move to Jetspeed-2. > > > > My personal opinion (but I think most developers will agree) is that > > Jetspeed and portlets should be separate modules in the future. > > > > Jetspeed 2 will ship with functionality as a portal tool > > (administration), and a few key or simple demo portlets. > > > > Jetspeed will have separate modules for hosting development of portlets > > like what you are proposing, shipping in different "portlet > > applications". The original proposal for the Portlet API included > > facilities for doing this. I don't think they will drop it, since it is > > a highly desirable feature. > > > > So, while I think it will be worthwhile to look more into your proposal, > > I suggest that you open a bugzilla issue (Request For Enhancement), and > > discuss features and dependencies with interested people there. In this > > way, you can proceed without bringing additional dependencies inside > > jetspeed. > > > > If it looks worthwhile, it could be put in the scratchpad to develop > > there until it can be released (in the Jetspeed-2 infrastructure) as a > > portlet application. Or people could build it separately from the > > scratchpad. > > > > Regards, > > Santiago > > > > P.S.) I CC: dev, since it mostly belong to jetspeed development. > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
