David Sean Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> -The parameter parse has been heavily rewritten and back-ported from
>> Fulcrum, which was much better, and should give better results now
>>
>Thats a little scary without good HttpUnit/JWebUnit are similar tests
>in place
>I hope that the behavior is still the same!
Of course. We write "backward-compatible" quite big.
>> - The whole URI / TemplateLink stuff is completely new. The old classes
>> (which really weren't good code) are stil there but deprecated. I
>> would
>> recommend to move to the new code, which is much cleaner and better
>> structured.
>>
>Deprecated DynamicURI and TemplateLink?
Yes.
>Is there a migration path?
Yes. If you're using the tools, you simply change the class names for the
tools in TR.props and then you're set.
>Im afraid we are heavily dependent on that one.
>My vote is that we do not move to the new version of Turbine until it
>is THOROUGHLY TESTED
You're welcome to test and try. Most people that started using 2.3 never went
back to 2.2
>Is there anything left in Turbine?
I don't understand this sentence.
Regards
Henning
--
Dipl.-Inf. (Univ.) Henning P. Schmiedehausen INTERMETA GmbH
[EMAIL PROTECTED] +49 9131 50 654 0 http://www.intermeta.de/
Java, perl, Solaris, Linux, xSP Consulting, Web Services
freelance consultant -- Jakarta Turbine Development -- hero for hire
"Dominate!! Dominate!! Eat your young and aggregate! I have grotty silicon!"
-- AOL CD when played backwards (User Friendly - 200-10-15)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
