Celeste, I've not evaluated but ran across this some time ago: http://www.gridsphere.org/
(Site seems to be down at the moment. When I saw it - JSR compatability was intended or completed?) May be able to access some information here http://www.gridlab.org/Software/portal.html#GridSphere > -----Original Message----- > From: Celeste Haseltine [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, October 27, 2003 4:30 PM > To: 'Jetspeed Users List' > Subject: RE: Other Open Source Portals > > > Andy, > > Thanks for the heads up on PortalImpl. I will take a look at it. > > What I meant to say was that Liferay was based on Hibernator, not > Hypersonic. That's what I get for trying to do three things at once while > typing an email. > > Thanks again Andy! > > Celeste > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Andy Pruitt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, October 27, 2003 2:54 PM > To: Jetspeed Users List > Subject: RE: Other Open Source Portals > > > > > > I have looked at the current beta version of Jetspeed, and > > for a variety of reasons have determine that it is not the > > open source portal framework that I need to go with for a new > > project I have been assigned to. I think 2.0 would be > > excellent, but I am unable to wait until 1st quarter 2004, as > > I have to have something out the door by early Jan 2004. I > > am in the process of evaluating Liferay, which is a 168 > > compliant open source portal based on Hypersonic and Struts. > > The down side is that it is almost all EJB based. > > Although Liferay is not in fact Hypersonic based, it is also > not fully 168 compliant. In particular, it doesn't handle > portlet applications (deployed as a separate WAR file). I > suspect that there are a large number of other > not-yet-compliant aspects to liferay. > > > > > > I have to make a decision soon as to which framework we will > > use on our new project. So I thought I would ask if there > > are any other JSR 168 compliant open source portals out there > > that people are familiar with. I have not yet looked at > > Pluto, but I understand it is just a framework by which you > > can build your own portal from. I would prefer to utilize an > > If you need a light weight portal implementation, that doesn't > have a lot of services etc, portalImpl (the pluto driver) may > be worth a look. You'll be on your own, as it is essentially > unsupported by the jetspeed/pluto community, but it is a large > enough piece of portal to save you some time and get you started. > > > > open source portal that already has some implementation built > > in for logging, roles, groups, users, etc, as we are on a > > very short time frame. Is anyone else out there aware of any > > other 168 compliant open source portals I should look at? To > > date, Jetspeed and Liferay are the only two that I have > > found, and Liferay is the only stable product that I found > > out there at this time. > > > > Thanks in advance for any advice/recommendations offered. > > > > Celeste Haseltine, PE > > J2EE Architect > > 972-512-5103 > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
